How Tariffs Affect International Commercial Contracts

Introduction

In an increasingly globalized world, international commercial contracts serve as the foundation for cross-border trade. These agreements outline terms and conditions governing transactions involving goods, services, intellectual property, and more. However, one critical variable that can drastically impact these contracts is tariffs—government-imposed duties on imported or exported goods.

Tariffs not only affect the cost structure of transactions but also introduce legal, financial, and strategic complexities that businesses must navigate. Understanding how tariffs influence international commercial contracts is essential for companies involved in global trade to ensure compliance, reduce risk, and maintain profitability.

1. Understanding Tariffs and Their Purpose

Tariffs are financial charges levied by governments on goods as they cross national borders. The primary purposes of tariffs include:

• Protecting domestic industries from foreign competition
• Generating government revenue
• Encouraging fair trade practices
• Responding to trade disputes or violations

Tariffs come in various forms:

• Ad valorem tariffs – calculated as a percentage of the good’s value
• Specific tariffs – a fixed amount per unit of goods
• Compound tariffs – a combination of both

Tariffs can be imposed at different stages—on raw materials, intermediate goods, or finished products—thus affecting supply chains differently.

2. Tariff Implications for Contract Pricing and Cost Allocation

The most immediate impact of tariffs on commercial contracts is their effect on pricing. Tariffs increase the cost of imported goods, and this additional expense must be accounted for in the contract. Key questions arise:

• Who bears the cost of the tariff?
• Is the price fixed or adjustable?
• What happens if tariffs change mid-contract?

To address these, contracts often include price adjustment clauses or tariff pass-through provisions, clearly stating how such changes affect the contract price.

For example, in a CIF (Cost, Insurance, Freight) contract, the seller may bear the tariff cost, whereas in an EXW (Ex Works) contract, the buyer is responsible.

3. Force Majeure and Tariff Risk

Force majeure clauses protect parties from liabilities caused by unforeseen events beyond their control. The rise of unpredictable tariff regimes—especially during trade wars—has led companies to explore whether sudden tariff hikes qualify as force majeure.

However, courts are typically conservative in accepting economic events like tariffs under force majeure unless explicitly mentioned in the clause. Therefore, companies now draft customized force majeure language to cover major tariff changes, embargoes, and trade restrictions.

4. Governing Law and Jurisdictional Challenges

Tariffs are often politically motivated and vary by jurisdiction. This creates uncertainty, especially when contracts are governed by a legal system different from the country imposing tariffs.

A U.S. buyer importing from China may face Chinese export tariffs and U.S. import tariffs, yet the contract may be governed by English law. This raises questions about:

• Interpretation of tariff-related clauses
• Remedies available in case of breach
• Applicability of international trade conventions

To address this, contracts must align tariff provisions with the chosen governing law and dispute resolution mechanisms, such as ICC arbitration.

5. Incoterms and Tariff Allocation

The Incoterms (International Commercial Terms) defined by the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) play a central role in assigning tariff responsibilities. For example:

• DAP (Delivered at Place) – Seller bears all costs, including tariffs, until delivery.
• DDP (Delivered Duty Paid) – Seller covers import duties and taxes.
• FCA (Free Carrier) – Buyer assumes responsibility once goods are handed to the carrier.

Choosing the correct Incoterm directly impacts who pays the tariffs, thereby influencing the pricing and legal obligations in the contract.

6. Tariff Escalation and Long-Term Contracts

Tariff escalation poses a risk for long-term supply agreements. A product tariff that is 5% today could increase to 25% next year due to trade policy shifts. Such fluctuations jeopardize margins and can lead to contractual disputes.

Mitigating strategies include:

• Tariff adjustment clauses
• Reopener provisions to renegotiate terms
• Hardship clauses enabling a party to seek relief

Without these, parties may default or be forced into costly renegotiations.

7. Tariffs and Contract Performance Obligations

Tariffs can render performance commercially impracticable. For instance, if a 200% retaliatory tariff is suddenly imposed, the supplier may be unable to fulfill orders without incurring significant losses.

Some legal systems recognize “commercial impracticability” as a defense, but others do not. Therefore, contracts should include explicit clauses outlining:

• Thresholds for renegotiation
• Rights to suspend or terminate
• Mitigation procedures

Well-drafted contracts anticipate such scenarios to protect both parties.

8. Impact on Supply Chain and Sourcing Agreements

Tariffs can drive businesses to reconfigure supply chains, shifting production or sourcing to tariff-friendly jurisdictions. This often triggers the need to:

• Amend existing contracts
• Draft new supplier agreements
• Negotiate logistics and warehousing terms

Additionally, companies might include country-of-origin clauses to mitigate exposure and comply with rules of origin under free trade agreements (FTAs).

9. Trade Compliance and Contractual Representations

International contracts often include representations and warranties regarding compliance with applicable laws, including customs and tariff regulations.

A supplier may represent that:

• Goods comply with import/export laws
• Tariffs have been accurately calculated
• Classification codes are correct

A breach of these representations can lead to claims for damages, indemnification, or even contract termination.

Contracts should also include audit rights to verify compliance and tariff accuracy.

10. Strategic Use of Tariff Engineering

Some businesses use tariff engineering to legally reduce tariff liability by modifying:

• Product design
• Manufacturing location
• Product classification (HS codes)

Contracts can support this by:

• Outlining product specifications
• Allocating responsibility for classification
• Defining consequences for misclassification

However, such strategies must be implemented with caution to avoid violations of customs regulations.

11. Dispute Resolution in Tariff-Impacted Contracts

Tariff-related disputes may arise due to:

• Disagreement on price adjustments
• Performance delays
• Tariff misclassification

Parties must ensure that dispute resolution clauses in contracts are robust. Options include:

• Mediation followed by arbitration (e.g., under ICC or LCIA rules)
• Specifying the forum and seat of arbitration
• Choosing tariff-savvy arbitrators

An efficient dispute mechanism ensures that tariff shocks don’t paralyze trade.

12. The Role of International Treaties and FTAs

Free Trade Agreements (FTAs) and multilateral treaties like the WTO Agreement influence how tariffs apply. Contracts should refer to:

• Applicable trade treaties
• Preferential tariff regimes
• Certificates of origin

Leveraging FTAs can reduce tariff liability, but this requires compliance with rules of origin—which must be documented in the contract.

13. Insurance Considerations in Tariff Context

Commercial contracts may incorporate insurance clauses for risks like shipping damage, but rarely for tariff exposure.

Yet, new insurance products are emerging to cover tariff volatility and trade-related regulatory risks. Parties should explore:

• Trade disruption insurance
• Political risk insurance

Integrating insurance considerations within the contract strengthens risk mitigation.

14. Digital Trade and Non-Tariff Barriers

As digital products (software, AI, media) grow, non-tariff barriers (NTBs) like data localization laws, cross-border taxes, and censorship are replacing tariffs.

Modern contracts must account for:

• Jurisdiction-specific digital duties
• Geo-restrictions and export controls
• Compliance with evolving e-commerce regulations

Including NTB clauses helps future-proof contracts in a post-tariff world.

15. Case Studies and Lessons Learned

Case 1: US-China Trade War (2018–2020)
Thousands of contracts were disrupted due to escalating tariffs. Companies with no tariff clauses suffered heavy losses, while those with adjustment and reopener clauses could renegotiate terms.

Case 2: Brexit
The UK’s exit from the EU introduced tariff uncertainties. Smart companies added Brexit clauses to their contracts, anticipating potential duty changes.

These examples underscore the importance of proactive drafting and scenario planning.

Conclusion

Tariffs are no longer just an economic concern—they are a strategic and legal issue that must be managed at the contract level. From pricing and risk allocation to compliance and dispute resolution, every clause in an international commercial contract may be influenced by tariff considerations.

As the global trade environment grows more complex and politically volatile, businesses must evolve their contracts to be flexible, protective, and responsive to tariff-related risks.

Did you find this article worthwhile? More engaging blogs and products about smart contracts on the blockchain, contract management software, and electronic signatures can be found in the Legitt AI. You may also contact Legitt to hire the best contract lifecycle management services and solutions, along with free contract templates.